Chief Justice of India UU Lalit: President Draupadi Murmu appointed Justice Uday Umesh Lalit as the next Chief Justice of India (CJI). Justice Lalit will assume his new responsibility on August 27.
Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, who was appointed as the 49th Chief Justice of India (CJI) on Wednesday after President Draupadi Murmu signed a warrant of appointment, will become the second head of the Indian judiciary to be directly appointed by a Supreme Court bench will be promoted to bar.
Justice SM Sikri, who became the 13th CJI in January 1971, was the first lawyer to be directly elevated to the apex court bench in March 1964.
Justice Lalit will assume office on August 27, a day after Chief Justice NV Ramana stepped down.
Justice Lalit will have a brief tenure of less than three months as CJI and will retire on November 8 this year. The retirement age of Supreme Court judges is 65 years.
All You Need To Know About Justice UU Lalit, 49th Chief Justice Of India
Justice Lalit, who was a senior advocate before being appointed as a Supreme Court judge on August 13, 2014, has been a part of several important judgments that held the practice of instant ‘triple talaq’ among Muslims as illegal and unconstitutional.
In January 2019, he recused himself from hearing the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land title dispute in Ayodhya.
Justice Lalit, who was part of a five-judge Constitution bench headed by then CJI Ranjan Gogoi, “expressed his reluctance to participate in further hearings” and recused himself from the Ayodhya case.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for one of the Muslim parties in the case, had told the Constitution Bench that Justice Lalit had appeared in a related matter in the year 1997 as the counsel for former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Kalyan Singh.
One of the path-breaking judgments, which also included Justice Lalit, was the August 2017 decision by a five-judge Constitution Bench, which by a 3:2 majority mandated the practice of instant divorce through ‘triple talaq’ to be “void” relaxed me. “Illegal” and “unconstitutional”.
While the then Chief Justice JS Khehar and Justice S Abdul Nazeer were in favor of staying the judgment for six months and asking the government to bring in a law to that effect, Justices Kurian Joseph, RF Nariman and Lalit observed this. Keeping the practice as such is a violation of the Constitution. Justices Khehar, Joseph and Nariman have since retired.
Recently, a bench headed by Justice Lalit assembled at 9.30 am, an hour before the normal working hours of the Supreme Court to hear cases.
Justice Lalit had said, “I think ideally we should sit at 9 in the morning. I have always said that if our children can go to school at 7 in the morning, why can’t we come at 9 in the morning.”
In other important judgments, a bench headed by Justice Lalit had empowered the erstwhile royal family of Travancore to manage Kerala’s historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, one of the richest temples, observing that it was “a legacy of the rule must be attached to the “right of shebait of the temple” (servant).
The bench had accepted the appeal of the legal heirs of Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma, the younger brother of the last ruler Sri Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma, which had set aside the Kerala High Court’s 2011 judgment asking the state government to set up a trust was instructed. Management of the temple and control of the property.
In another important judgment, a bench headed by Justice Lalit had ruled that touching of the sexual parts of a child’s body or any act involving physical contact with ‘sexual intent’ is punishable under Section 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses. Under what is considered ‘sexual assault’. POCSO) act as the most important ingredient is sexual intent and not skin-to-skin contact.
While setting aside the controversial ‘skin-to-skin’ judgment of the Bombay High Court in two cases under the POCSO Act, the bench had observed that the High Court erred in holding that there was no offense as there was no direct ‘skin-to-skin’ was. ‘Contact with sexual intent.
The High Court had held that if there is no direct skin-to-skin contact between an accused and a victim, then no offense of sexual harassment under the POCSO Act is made out. Chief Justice of India UU Lalit
Justice Lalit, who is also the acting chairman of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), had recently said that NALSA is going to set up a “legal aid” system for the poor and underprivileged in all districts on the lines of public office. Prosecutors. He was addressing the first All India District Legal Services Authority meeting here.
Born on November 9, 1957, Justice Lalit enrolled as an advocate in June 1983 and practiced in the Bombay High Court till December 1985.
Justice UU Lalit has been appointed on the recommendation of CJI NV Raman, who will step down on August 26. Justice Lalit will have a tenure of 74 days as Chief Justice, and will retire on November 8.
Born on November 9, 1957 in Solapur, Maharashtra, Justice Lalit enrolled as an advocate by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa in June 1983. He practiced in the Bombay High Court till December 1985 before shifting his practice to Delhi in January 1986.
Justice Lalit is an expert in criminal law and has conducted trials as Special Public Prosecutor of CBI in all 2G cases. He also served as a member of the Legal Services Committee of the Supreme Court for two terms.
Justice Lalit was appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court in August 2014 from the bar. He is the second Chief Justice to be directly elevated to the Supreme Court from the Bar after Justice SM Sikri, who served as the 13th CJI in 1971.
He has been a part of several important cases and delivered some landmark judgments, most notable being the Triple Talaq verdict, the Travancore royal family’s claim of management rights to the Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Kerala, and a judgment on the law relating to sexual offences. Against Children (POCSO).
